To assist with this matter, we have created a number of documents to help. In addition, we have also updated work carried out by the University of Bath to create a simple 4-step guide that helps you understand if a project you are conducting is a clinical audit, click here. Our advice would always be that if you are planning to carry out a clinical audit project then you should contact your local clinical audit team that may also be known as clinical effectiveness, clinical governance, quality improvement, etc.
Of course, NHS Trusts and providers must make sure that their finances balance and therefore financial audits will be conducted as standard. These are entirely separate from clinical audit. However, significant event audit SEA is an established technique that is used much like clinical audit to make improvements and ensure care is safe and effective. We have provided an infographic, click here to help you understand how clinical audit and significant event audit differ.
Audit and Audit Cycle
In a nutshell, while clinical audit compares current practice to agreed standards and focuses on a population of patients, significant event audit looks at individual cases of care where a problem has occurred with the objective of understanding what went wrong. Both clinical audit and SEA compare care with best practice but adopt different approaches.
Proactive teams should be familiar with both techniques not least as clinical audit and SEA can help inform each other. T: E: info clinicalauditsupport. Toggle navigation.
What is Clinical Audit | Clinical Audit Support Centre
What is Clinical Audit. Definitions for Clinical Audit Since audit was introduced in the late s there have been many different definitions. Two thirds of these funds were allocated to Health Boards for local audit. The remainder is used to support CRAG's other work eg publications, conferences and committee expenses. The administrative costs of the Secretariat are centrally funded. The range and scope of projects funded through the NPC and more recently through CEPS is extensive, covering a wide range of specialties and disciplines.
However, this represents only a small part of the total work that is currently being undertaken in Scotland, with the major part being carried out at local level. In the early days of audit, the priority was to stimulate interest and involvement in audit. As a result projects funded by NPC tended to be ad-hoc , reflecting the interests and needs of the clinicians involved.
Since CEPS was set up, the focus has changed towards supporting a number of commissioned programmes concentrating on the national priorities. Individual projects range greatly in size and scope. Some are tightly focussed on a particular aspect of treatment, for example the Scottish national audit of ECT.
It also has a commitment to initiate one new topic-based audit each year. These identify a baseline measurement from which effective evaluation can be achieved. Current and recently completed projects can be grouped together in nine broad areas the number of projects in each area is shown in brackets. Details of current and past projects are available on the CRAG website. In Tayside and Forth Valley, the grant holders will integrate the hospital-based diabetes systems with dedicated general practice information transfer systems using optical character reader OCR technology. In Lanarkshire, the hospital-based Lanarkshire system will be integrated with general practices using a mixture of paper proformas and electronic data capture to create an efficient register and recall system.
The project will audit the components of locally derived diabetes data set SIGN 25 before and after the implementation of general practice information transfer system, with comparison between the three regions. It is a randomised control trial designed to compare the benefits of SIGN guidelines with SIGN guidelines reinforced by a formal structured training programme. Standards that have an influence on survival and quality of life will be identified and the implementation of changes in practice to achieve them will be discussed with all nephrologists in Scotland.
The standards will then be re-measured, in the light of changes made, completing the quality cycle. For further details see above. The objectives and action plan to undertake this work are set out in the SICS Audit Group paper dated February and will form the basis for monitoring progress.
- A Focus on Quality: page 6;
- Skin Care for Teens.
- Introduction to Clinical Effectiveness and Audit in Healthcare.
- Moving a Church from Good to Great;
- Introduction to Clinical Audit;
One of CRAG's roles is to review the development of local audit and to do this, each local area is asked to produce an annual report. As audit developed to become a strand of clinical effectiveness, Health Boards were asked to extend their audit activity reports to become clinical effectiveness reports. CRAG also visits a range of Health Board areas to assess progress against clinical effectiveness goals which are set annually.
Clinical effectiveness reports from different Health Board areas in Scotland vary widely, reflecting the different structures and systems in place and local challenges. Reports generally include an assessment of performance against CRAG goals and a summary of largely audit work undertaken in the area during the previous 12 months. In October , CIS issued new goals for the NHSiS Figure 1 , taking account of the impact of clinical governance and changes in the support available for clinical quality improvement. The goals provide a template to guide and monitor the development of clinical effectiveness in Scotland.
CIS also considered whether the previous approach to clinical effectiveness visits was appropriate given the reconfiguration of Trusts, the setting up of the Clinical Standards Board for Scotland, and the new focus on clinical governance. CRAG recognised the benefits of wide consultation with the service over its needs for support in clinical effectiveness, and for following up issues identified in Clinical Effectiveness Reports.
It also provided an opportunity to reinforce the new strategic direction of CRAG in general and the clinical effectiveness goals specifically. A report based on this series of visits is available on the CRAG website. Although the visits highlighted a number of issues that need to be addressed, there was evidence of good and interesting work on clinical effectiveness from every Health Board area. These goals are relevant to the whole of the NHS in Scotland. They should be interpreted as applying to primary care, community services, acute hospitals, Health Boards and centrally funded services.
To avoid repetition, the goals refer only to 'Trusts'. Trusts should have an explicit strategy for clinical effectiveness, which should be part of a broader quality and clinical governance strategy. Organisational arrangements and mechanisms for the systematic monitoring and improvement of the quality of clinical care should be in place. Trusts should have an appropriate infrastructure to support clinical audit and clinical effectiveness, and be able to provide evidence of:.
Trusts should foster a culture in which clinical effectiveness is integral to all clinical care. Developing clinical effectiveness skills should be central to continuing professional education and development, and part of a multidisciplinary systematic approach to continuous quality improvement. Clinical effectiveness activities should support priority setting and reflect:. Trusts should make sure that all operational sub-units have identified programmes of clinical effectiveness activity.
Trusts should promote clinical effectiveness activities that cross boundaries and support collaboration within and between Primary Care Trusts, Acute Trusts, emerging managed clinical networks and other agencies.
Requirements for audit by UK doctors
Trusts should be able to demonstrate that cost effectiveness issues are being addressed alongside clinical effectiveness. Trusts should be able to demonstrate that clinical effectiveness activities are:. One of CRAG's roles is to nurture and develop national systems to audit care. A number of these audits provide a detailed 'snapshot' of a service, allowing problems to be identified and improvements made. In some cases, a decision is taken to maintain the audit over the long term.
This is an area of activity currently being expanded and is seen as a service to Trusts in support of their Clinical Governance responsibilities. Since , CRAG has hosted an annual symposium on clinical audit and more recently clinical effectiveness to provide feedback to the Health Service about work being carried out in Scotland. In the early years, the symposia featured a broad and sometimes eclectic range of examples of work.
As audit has became more firmly established and the annual meetings increasingly popular, the events have been extended to include themed parallel sessions to allow delegates to hear a series of presentations around specific topics. In these included cancer, coronary heart disease, mental health and primary care.
The CRAG meetings have provided an opportunity for people working in audit to present details of their work to a national audience. These symposia have become an important feature of the annual calendar of the NHS, allowing an exchange of information and experiences among a diverse group of people.
Approximately people from a wide range of geographical and specialty areas attended the 10th CRAG symposium in December Initially, the focus of CRAG's work was to encourage the uptake of audit and evidence-based medicine.